Customer story · Precast

How Fraserway Prekast cut rework and passed a CSA audit with CONQA

Mike Savage runs a fifty-year-old precast yard. This is how his QC checks started earning their keep.

20015records

The furthest behind Mike got in a recent week – after not looking for a full day. At worst on paper, he was two hundred behind.

“If you're looking for an effective quality management system that drives efficiencies, I wouldn't look anywhere else.”

Mike Savage, Fraserway Prekast
A Fraserway Prekast truck-mounted crane unloading precast elements on a civil site

The pile in the corner

There used to be a pile of pre-pour and post-pour checklists in the back corner of Mike Savage's office, and he dreaded walking past it. Every sheet in it needed his signature somewhere between three and thirty times. He had a stamp made because his wrist stopped keeping up.

“It would keep me up at night. I would take it home on the weekends, two hours going through all of it, because it was so arduous.”

Mike Savage

The pile was, in a way, his own doing. Fraserway Prekast is more than fifty years old, built on cemetery products and onsite wastewater. Mike joined in 2010, and within a year or two he moved the business into civil infrastructure, utilities, road building, custom structures. The business plan for that was his. So was the decision to build a quality management system and get certified, at a point when none of Fraserway's clients were asking for one.

“The whole concept of a certification was the rambling of this madman that says, if we're going to go after this market, you have to have this as a minimum.”

Mike Savage

Certified early, blind anyway

The Ministry of Transportation requires it now. It did not then. Fraserway wrote the system on ISO principles with a consultant, built the documentation, and certified in February 2014. Then they ran it on paper for twelve years. This is not the story of a yard that ignored quality until a client forced its hand. It is the story of the yard that went looking for certification early, and ended up with a record that was arduous and time consuming to manage.

Ask Mike what hurt most and he does not say the signing. Given the choice between the man hours and the visibility, he picks the visibility without pausing.

“How do you know things are being done correctly if the checks are being done, but they're not being reviewed during the process? You couldn't bring something to somebody's attention while they were setting things up. It was more of a historical account of what happened with this piece.”

Mike Savage

The checks themselves happened on time. A QC tech went through the sheet with the piece in front of him and signed it off. What lagged was everything after. The sheet went from the floor to Mike's desk to sign, to an admin to scan, to a folder. Some took six months to surface, and at worst he was two hundred sheets behind. The check had already done its work on the floor. The second set of eyes arrived too late to add anything to it. A check sheet that reaches Mike six months after the pour cannot be acted on.

“Previously I couldn't reject it, because it was too late anyway.”

Mike Savage

Twelve years of certified process, and the review at the end of it could only ever confirm what had already happened.

The bolt pattern that never reached site

Fraserway moved onto CONQA in 2026. Mike expected the setup to fight him – a decade of history sat in how they tracked and stored records – but the platform was configured around their existing operation and checklists rather than the other way round. What changed was not that Fraserway started doing QC. They always checked their products. It was that the checksheets now reached Mike while the work was still in production, not weeks after it.

On a recent job, a crew photographed a setup at the pre-pour stage, now a required step in their CONQA pre-pour checklist. The photo showed a bolt pattern that would not have matched the base plate on the pole. Someone saw it, said so, and it was corrected before the casting. Caught on the floor, it cost nothing but the fix. Set in the ground and found on site, the same mismatch is a tear-out Mike puts at $2,500 to $10,000.

Fraserway had always done pre-pour checks. What it had never had was Mike approving them while the product was waiting to pour. That changed what QC could be. Mike's QC techs work against the drawing with the tape measure in the photo, and he holds them to it, because now he can.

“We need pictures of this stuff, guys. This is important. Make sure the record is there, because if it's not, I'm going to reject it.”

Mike Savage

A Fraserway base in the ground, pole bolted down. The pre-pour photo now checks this join before the concrete goes in – a mismatch found here instead is a $2,500 to $10,000 tear-out.

A traffic-signal pole standing on a Fraserway Prekast concrete base beside a new road

The pile is gone

The pile in the corner went too. Mike clears sign-offs on his phone while he is waiting on people, and the furthest behind he got in a recent week was fifteen, after not looking for a full day.

“Now I just can't get that far behind.”

Mike Savage

The handling between a check and a filed record is simply gone.

“There's no resorting. There's no give it to Mike, let him sign it. There's no Mike signs it, gives it to the admin, so the admin can scan it into the computer, then put it in the right location. It's already in the right location.”

Mike Savage

He puts the time back at three to four hours a week for himself and around ten for each of his QC techs. But the hours are the smaller half of it. On paper, the work of documenting checks competed with the inspection itself. His techs spent so long writing it up, storing it, chasing it, that the writing crowded out the looking. Now the record is a few taps, and the job is the inspection again, not the paperwork wrapped around it.

The audit

The same working record answers a question his clients have not asked yet. Fraserway's clients request documentation one piece at a time, which on paper meant isolating a single element out of a full day's production and hunting down the scans, sometimes well over a year after a project closed. Now every piece is tied to the room it was cast in and the date it was cast, and each of those is tied to a record. He already works that way inside the business. The day a client asks, he will do the same thing for them.

“I think it would be a significantly easier exercise to pull those records.”

Mike Savage

The proof that it holds up came three months after go-live, when Fraserway put its CONQA records in front of a CSA auditor. The records held. For Fraserway, certification decides which work they are allowed to bid on, so a clean audit is not a nicety. The next job depends on it.

“It's a very effective quality management system that gives very high level quality documentation and records that would fulfil any inspector or auditor's needs.”

Mike Savage

Asked how he would describe CONQA to another producer, Mike does not hedge.

“If you're looking for an effective quality management system that drives efficiencies, I wouldn't look anywhere else.”

Mike Savage

What he actually bought

But the first time Mike and CONQA spoke, what he wanted had nothing to do with efficiency, or documentation, or audits. He wanted to stop lying awake wondering what had gone wrong.

“That isn't keeping me awake anymore. Knowing that it's right, having seen it. I don't go home thinking I wonder if that was really done properly. I know it is, because I see it.”

Mike Savage

Piece number, pour date, weight, written on the concrete – and behind them, a record: every piece tied to the room it was cast in and the date it was cast.

A Fraserway Prekast custom structure marked up with its piece number, pour date and weight

See it on work like yours.

CONQA puts the check sheet in front of the reviewer while the work is still on the floor – so QC can act on it, not archive it.